- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Romania
- /
- Greenpeace Romania v. OMV Petrom and Romgaz
Greenpeace Romania v. OMV Petrom and Romgaz
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Pending
Geography
Court/admin entity
Romania → Bucharest Court of AppealRomania → Bucharest Court of First Instance
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals (Global) → Corporations (Global) → Environmental assessment and permitting (Global) → Natural resource extraction (Global) → GHG emissions reduction (Global)Suits against governments (Global) → Energy and power (Global)Suits against governments (Global) → Environmental assessment and permitting (Global) → Natural resource extraction (Global)Suits against governments (Global) → GHG emissions reduction and trading (Global) → Other (Global)
Principal law
European Union → Secondary Law → Directives → 2011/92/EURomania → Government Emergency Ordinance No. 195/2005 on Environmental Protection
At issue
Whether the approval of the urban zoning plan for the Neptun Deep gas project's onshore works is lawful under Romanian and EU environmental impact assessment laws, by failing to include a climate impact assessment.
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Summary
In July of 2024, Greenpeace Romania filed a complaint against the urban zoning plan connected to the Neptun Deep Gas Project, which is facilitated by OMV Petrom and Romgaz. Greenpeace Romania submitted the complaint before the Bucharest Court of First Instance, contending that no climate impact assessment had been conducted for the project’s onshore works, thus failing to comply with environmental impact assessment regulations.
The court dismissed Greenpeace’s claim, declining to assess the legality of the environmental permit. Greenpeace Romania, noting that other Romanian courts have undertaken more extensive analyses of environmental permits, filed an appeal with the Bucharest Court of Appeal. The court issued a judgement early in 2025 rejecting the appeal, ordering Greenpeace to pay approximately 30,000 EUR each to OMV and Romgaz. Greenpeace retains the right to appeal further for a definitive ruling.
In the meantime, Romgaz, which is 70% government-owned, began a lawsuit to dissolve Greenpeace Romania. The complaint alleges that Greenpeace Romania is engaged in fraudulent business practices.