- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Healthy Gulf v. Burgum
Healthy Gulf v. Burgum
Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Memorandum filed in support of Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s motion to intervene as a defendant.
Geography
Docket number
1:25-cv-04016
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)United States → One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)
At issue
Challenge to the first of 30 oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico required by the July 4, 2025 Reconciliation Act (also referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act).
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
12/01/2025
Memorandum filed in support of Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s motion to intervene as a defendant.
Motion To Intervene
11/18/2025
Complaint filed.
Environmental organizations filed a lawsuit asking the federal district court for the District of Columbia to vacate the final notice of sale for the first of 30 oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico required by the July 4, 2025 Reconciliation Act (also referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act). The organizations asserted that the federal defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS); the organizations contended that nothing in the Reconciliation Act exempted the Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management (BOEM) from NEPA obligations. The complaint alleged that the BOEM failed to take a hard look at the environmental effects of the lease sale and to consider a reasonable range of alternatives. To the extent BOEM relied on a programmatic EIS released in August 2025, the organizations contended the analysis was inadequate. In addition, the plaintiffs asserted that defendants’ actions were arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and not in accordance with law due to the “extensive involvement” of BOEM’s acting director whose participation was prohibited by ethics rule and direction from the Department of the Interior Ethics Office.
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to the first of 30 oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico required by the July 4, 2025 Reconciliation Act (also referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act).
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance