Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Henry v. EPA

Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2022
Status
Pending
Court/admin entity
GuyanaSupreme Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global)Access to information (Global)Suits against governments (Global)Environmental assessment and permitting (Global)Natural resource extraction (Global)Suits against governments (Global)GHG emissions reduction and trading (Global)Other (Global)
Principal law
GuyanaEnvironmental Protection Act 1996
At issue
Whether Guyana’s Environmental Protection Agency’s issuing of an oil exploration permit violates Guyanese environmental laws.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
01/21/2022
Application for order of certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition
Application

Summary

In February 2022, three Guyanese citizens (Sinikka Henry, a lecturer at the University of Guyana, Sherlina Nageer, and Andriska Thorington, students at the University of Guyana) filed suit alleging that the Guyanese Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to grant a modified environmental permit to Esso violated Guyanese environmental laws, where the modified permit allows Esso/ExxonMobil to flare gas in exchange for paying a fee. The plaintiffs seek several Court Orders, including quashing the EPA’s decision to grant the modified permit, and ordering the EPA to issue reports on Esso’s activities, failures to uphold environmental provisions in the permit, and the emissions impacts of Esso’s operations.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Risk
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance