- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Brazil
- /
- Maranhão
- /
- IBAMA vs. Minerva Ribeiro de Barros e Genesisagro S/A
About this cases
Filing year
2023
Status
Pending
Court/admin entity
Brazil → Maranhão → Maranhão Federal Court
Case category
Suits against corporations, individuals → Corporations → Climate damage
Principal law
Brazil → Federal Constitution of 1988Brazil → Forest Code (Law No. 12.651 of 2012)Brazil → National Environmental Policy Act (Law No. 6.938 of 1981)
At issue
Restoration for environmental and climate damage caused by deforestation in the Cerrado.
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
09/11/2018
Initial Petition from IBAMA (in Portuguese)
Petition
Summary
On September 11, 2023, Brazil’s Federal Environment Agency (“IBAMA”), filed a public civil action (environmental class-action) against Minerva Ribeiro de Barros e Genesisagro S/A. seeking compensation for environmental and climate damages. The plaintiff claims that 190,960 ha (hectares) of native Cerrado forest were cleared at the Pedra Chata Piranhas farm without prior authorization from the competent environmental agency. It highlights the great importance of the Cerrado and that the advance of illegal deforestation of the biome contributes to the climate crisis. According to remote sensing images, the plaintiff claims that the area continues to be exploited (even though it has been embargoed by IBAMA), without regeneration measures having been adopted. It argues that the defendants are civilly liable for the specific environmental damage caused by the irregular suppression of native forest in the Cerrado and the existence of resulting environmental damage that includes damage to fauna, soil, climate and biodiversity, among other harmful consequences related to deforestation. Several measures to secure the prohibition of further exploitation of the deforested area are requested as an injunction. In a definitive manner, it is requested that the defendants be ordered to (i) recover an area corresponding to the deforested one, (ii) pay collective moral damages in the amount of R$1,442,320.88, (iii) pay for the transitory and residual damage caused to ecological heritage, in addition to compensation for the economic profit obtained illegally, including climate damage.