Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database
Litigation

In re Application of Enbridge Energy to Replace & Relocate Line 5 (Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians v. Michigan Public Service Commission)

About this case

Documents

Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
09/19/2025
Decision
Application for leave to appeal granted.
The Michigan Supreme Court granted two applications for leave to appeal a February 2025 Court of Appeals decision affirming the Michigan Public Service Commission’s conditional approval of an application by Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership (Enbridge) to replace and relocate a portion of its Line 5 fuel pipeline to a tunnel beneath the Straits of Mackinac. In its order granting an application filed by Tribes and environmental organizations, the Supreme Court indicated it would consider whether the Court of Appeals erred by (1) “applying a deferential standard of review rather than determining de novo whether the proposed conduct will pollute, impair, or destroy the air, water, or state’s other natural resources or the public trust in these resources under … the Michigan Environmental Protection Act” and (2) “affirming the Michigan Public Service Commission’s limitation on the scope of the evidence to be reviewed regarding its determinations under … MEPA and its decision to exclude evidence of the history and risk of oil spills along the entire length of Line 5 in those determinations.” In the order granting a water issues-focused environmental organization’s application, the Supreme Court indicated it would consider common-law public trust doctrine issues.
04/02/2025
Application
Joint application for leave to appeal filed by Bay Mills Indian Community et al.
Two applications were filed seeking leave to appeal the Michigan Court of Appeals decision affirming the Michigan Public Service Commission’s conditional approval of an application by Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership (Enbridge) to replace and relocate a portion of its Line 5 fuel pipeline to a tunnel beneath the Straits of Mackinac. One of the applications argued that the Court of Appeals had applied the wrong standard of review under the Michigan Environmental Protection Act (MEPA) and that the case warranted review to correct the improperly narrow scope of impacts considered in the MEPA review.

Summary

Challenge to order approving Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership’s application to replace and relocate a segment of the Line 5 oil pipeline crossing the Straits of Mackinac.