Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

In re Border Infrastructure Environmental Litigation

Geography
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈΒ United States of America β†’ California
Year
2017
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2017
Status
Opinion issued affirming summary judgment for Department of Homeland Security.
Geography
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈΒ United States of America β†’ California
Docket number
18-55474, 18-55475, 18-55476
Court/admin entity
United States β†’ United States Federal Courts β†’ United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) β†’ NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) β†’ Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States β†’ Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)United States β†’ Endangered Species Act (ESA)United States β†’ Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility ActUnited States β†’ National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Document with title of In re: Border Infrastructure Environmental Litigation
Topics
, ,  

Documents

Each case in our database can contain one or more documents.

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
02/11/2019
Opinion issued affirming summary judgment for Department of Homeland Security.
Challenge to waivers for construction of border wall projects in California.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to waivers for construction of border wall projects in California.

Β Topics mentioned most in this case

See how often Topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document.

Group
Topics
Impacted group
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience