- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Louisiana
- /
- In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation
Litigation
In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
05/28/2015
Decision
Per curiam opinion issued.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of claims against the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the United States in which homeowners sought damages under three admiralty statutes for the exacerbation of Hurricane Katrina’s effects in the New Orleans area. The court held in an unpublished opinion that the Corps’ decision on its method of dredging the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet channel was shielded from liability by the discretionary function exemption. The court rejected the homeowners’ contention that the dredging method used by the Corps for decades caused wetland erosion in violation of federal and state statutes and regulations that specifically prescribed that the Corps use methods that would protect wetlands.
Summary
Action seeking damages from Army Corps of Engineers for exacerbation of flooding damage during and after Hurricane Katrina.