Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Inclusiv, Inc. v. EPA

About this case

Filing year
2025
Status
Motion for preliminary injunction filed.
Docket number
1:25-cv-00948
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsD.D.C.
Case category
Constitutional ClaimsFifth AmendmentConstitutional ClaimsOther Constitutional ClaimsFederal Statutory ClaimsOther Statutes and Regulations
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesAntideficiency ActUnited StatesAppointments ClauseUnited StatesAppropriations ClauseUnited StatesArticle I (U.S. Constitution)United StatesContract LawUnited StatesFifth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited StatesImpoundment Control ActUnited StatesInflation Reduction Act of 2022United StatesLegislative Vesting ClauseUnited StatesReplevinUnited StatesSeparation of Powers DoctrineUnited StatesSpending ClauseUnited StatesState Law—ConversionUnited StatesTake Care ClauseUnited StatesTucker ActUnited StatesUniform Grant Guidance Regulations
At issue
Lawsuits challenging EPA's freezing and purported termination of funding under the Inflation Reduction Act’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
04/01/2025
Emergency motion for temporary restraining order filed.
Motion
03/31/2025
Complaint filed.
Two entities that were awarded funding under EPA’s Clean Communities Investment Accelerator (CCIA) program filed lawsuits in federal district court in the District of Columbia challenging EPA and Citibank actions freezing and terminating the funding. The CCIA is one of three programs through which EPA implemented the Inflation Reduction Act’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. Inclusiv, Inc.—a nonprofit certified Community Development Financial Institution that works with credit unions—asserted that EPA’s actions violated the Administrative Procedure Act because they were contrary to the Inflation Reduction Act, the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, the Anti-Deficiency Act, and EPA regulations, and were arbitrary and capricious. Inclusiv also asserted that EPA violated separation of powers (the Legislative Vesting, Spending, Appropriations, and Take Care Clauses) and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. In addition, Inclusiv asserted that EPA’s actions were ultra vires. Against Citibank, Inclusiv asserted breach of contract, conversion, and replevin claims. The <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/justice-climate-fund-v-epa/">other lawsuit</a> was brought by Justice Climate Fund—“a purpose-built, non-profit organization that was founded to apply for CCIA funding on behalf of a consortium of community lender representatives.”
Complaint

Summary

Lawsuits challenging EPA's freezing and purported termination of funding under the Inflation Reduction Act’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Public finance actor
Adaptation/resilience