- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Inclusiv, Inc. v. EPA
Inclusiv, Inc. v. EPA
Geography
Date
2025
Document type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Motion for preliminary injunction filed.
Geography
Docket number
1:25-cv-00948
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → D.D.C.
Case category
Constitutional Claims → Fifth AmendmentConstitutional Claims → Other Constitutional ClaimsFederal Statutory Claims → Other Statutes and Regulations
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Antideficiency ActUnited States → Appointments ClauseUnited States → Appropriations ClauseUnited States → Article I (U.S. Constitution)United States → Contract LawUnited States → Fifth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited States → Impoundment Control ActUnited States → Inflation Reduction Act of 2022United States → Legislative Vesting ClauseUnited States → ReplevinUnited States → Separation of Powers DoctrineUnited States → Spending ClauseUnited States → State Law—ConversionUnited States → Take Care ClauseUnited States → Tucker ActUnited States → Uniform Grant Guidance Regulations
At issue
Lawsuits challenging EPA's freezing and purported termination of funding under the Inflation Reduction Act’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Summary
Document
03/31/2025
Complaint
Complaint filed.
Two entities that were awarded funding under EPA’s Clean Communities Investment Accelerator (CCIA) program filed lawsuits in federal district court in the District of Columbia challenging EPA and Citibank actions freezing and terminating the funding. The CCIA is one of three programs through which EPA implemented the Inflation Reduction Act’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. Inclusiv, Inc.—a nonprofit certified Community Development Financial Institution that works with credit unions—asserted that EPA’s actions violated the Administrative Procedure Act because they were contrary to the Inflation Reduction Act, the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, the Anti-Deficiency Act, and EPA regulations, and were arbitrary and capricious. Inclusiv also asserted that EPA violated separation of powers (the Legislative Vesting, Spending, Appropriations, and Take Care Clauses) and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. In addition, Inclusiv asserted that EPA’s actions were ultra vires. Against Citibank, Inclusiv asserted breach of contract, conversion, and replevin claims. The <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/justice-climate-fund-v-epa/">other lawsuit</a> was brought by Justice Climate Fund—“a purpose-built, non-profit organization that was founded to apply for CCIA funding on behalf of a consortium of community lender representatives.”
Summary
Lawsuits challenging EPA's freezing and purported termination of funding under the Inflation Reduction Act’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.