Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Indigenous Peoples of the Coastal Bend v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

About this case

Filing year
2021
Status
Federal defendants' and Enbridge's motions for summary judgment granted.
Docket number
2:21-cv-00161
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (S.D. Tex.)United StatesUnited States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Clean Water Act (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)NEPA (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesClean Water Act (CWA)United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to Clean Water Act permit for expansion of crude oil export terminal in Texas.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
07/27/2023
Federal defendants' and Enbridge's motions for summary judgment granted.
The federal district court for the Southern District of Texas granted summary judgment to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the owner of a crude export terminal on the Gulf Coast in a lawsuit challenging the Corps’ issuance of an amended permit to facilitate expansion of the terminal. The court rejected the claims by two Tribes and a local association that the Corps violated NEPA and the Clean Water Act, including by failing to analyze climate change and its impacts. The court first declined to permit extra-record evidence, including a 2018 climate assessment from the U.S. Global Change Research Program, of which the plaintiffs asked the court to take judicial notice for purposes of background information. On the merits of the plaintiffs’ argument regarding consideration of climate change, the court agreed with the defendants that the Corps did not have to consider the terminal’s downstream operational effects, but instead could limits its analysis to the specific activity requiring a Corps permit. Based on this scope of impacts, the court found that the Corps satisfied NEPA’s hard look standard when it considered the greenhouse gas emissions from construction activities and found them to be minimal. The court also rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the Corps’ public interest review overlooked climate change in violation of the Clean Water Act. The Corps found that the review was well reasoned and met Clean Water Act requirements.
Decision
08/22/2022
Plaintiffs filed response to Enbridge Ingleside Oil Terminal, LLC's cross-motion for summary judgment.
Response
08/22/2022
Plaintiffs filed response to federal defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment.
Response
07/22/2022
Federal defendants filed combined opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment.
Opposition
07/22/2022
Enbridge Ingleside Oil Terminal, LLC filed combined opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment.
Opposition
07/22/2022
Enbridge Ingleside Oil Terminal, LLC filed combined opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
07/22/2022
Federal defendants filed combined opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and cross-motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
08/03/2021
Complaint filed.
The Karankawa Kadla Tribe of the Texas Gulf Coast and two nonprofit organizations filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the federal district court for the Southern District of Texas challenging issuance of a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for expansion of the Moda Ingleside Energy Center, a crude oil export terminal in the Corpus Christi Ship Channel. The plaintiffs asserted violations of the Clean Water Act, NEPA, and the Administrative Procedure Act, including a failure to consider the expansion’s contribution to climate change.
Complaint

Summary

Challenge to Clean Water Act permit for expansion of crude oil export terminal in Texas.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance