- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- North Dakota
- /
- Iowa v. Council on Environmental Quality
Litigation
Iowa v. Council on Environmental Quality
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
03/31/2025
Appeal
Notice of appeal filed by intervenor-defendants Alaska Community Action on Toxics et al.
–
02/03/2025
Decision
Plaintiff states' motion for summary judgment granted and CEQ and intervenors' motions for summary judgment denied.
In a lawsuit in which 21 states challenged the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ’s) 2024 amendments to its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations, the federal district court for the District of North Dakota held that NEPA did not give CEQ authority to issue binding regulations. In addition, the court found that CEQ exceeded its authority by making changes to language regarding NEPA’s purpose, by including global effects as a factor for consideration, and by requiring review of categorical exclusions at least every 10 years. The court also found that the CEQ regulatory amendments would be arbitrary and capricious in various respects, though it rejected the plaintiff states’ argument that the 2024 rule changed “fundamental aspects of NEPA” that they had relied on pertaining to greenhouse gas emission quantification. The court vacated the 2024 amendments, leaving in place the 2020 version of the regulations. The court wrote that it “cannot think of a more serious deficiency than an agency acting without Congressional authority” and that even if another court found that there was authority, “the pervasive errors the Court has found through its analysis under the purported authority is equally disconcerting” and “seemingly reflect a motive to change NEPA into something it is not.”
06/04/2024
Complaint
First amended complaint filed.
Virginia joined the states challenging the amended NEPA regulations.
05/21/2024
Complaint
Complaint filed.
Twenty states, led by Iowa, filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of North Dakota challenging the Council on Environmental Quality’s amendments to the implementing regulations for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The states alleged that the final rule “illegally seeks to transform NEPA’s well-developed and carefully delineated procedures for environmental reviews of proposed federal agency actions into a substantive set of requirements to achieve broad and vague policy goals,” including by elevating “atextual justice and climate change considerations.” The states asserted that the final rule violates NEPA, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the major questions doctrine.
Summary
Challenge to Biden administration NEPA regulations.