- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Australia
- /
- New South Wales
- /
- KEPCO Bylong Australia v. Independent Planning Commission and Bylong Valley Protection Alliance
KEPCO Bylong Australia v. Independent Planning Commission and Bylong Valley Protection Alliance
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Decided
Geography
Court/admin entity
Australia → New South Wales → Court of Appeals → Land and Environment Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global) → Environmental assessment and permitting (Global) → Natural resource extraction (Global)
Principal law
Australia → Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW)Australia → Land and Environment Court Act (1979)Australia → The State Environmental Planning Policy (Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries) 2007
At issue
Whether a planning commission's rejection of a coal mine on sustainability and climate grounds was unlawful
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
09/14/2021
Decision
09/14/2021
Decision
12/18/2020
Judgment rejecting KEPCO's appeal and upholding Independent Planning Commission's rejection of the mine
Decision
04/29/2020
Court decision joining Bylong Valley Protection Alliance as second respondents
Decision
Summary
On September 18, 2019, the Independent Planning Commission of New South Wales rejected KEPCO Bylong Australia's application to build the Bylong Valley coal mine on several grounds, including its contribution to climate change. The Commission's grounds of refusal included the failure to develop a plan to manage the Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions associated with the project and the fact that "the distribution of costs and benefits over and beyond the life of the mine [was] temporally inequitable in that the economic benefits accrue to the current generation and the environmental, agricultural and heritage costs are borne by future generations."
KEPCO, a major Korean utility company, appealed the decision in the New South Wales Land and Environment Court on December 16, 2019. After the Commission declined to participate in the proceedings, the Bylong Valley Protection Alliance, a community group, successfully intervened and was joined as a second respondent.
On December 18, 2020, the Court rejected KEPCO's appeal, upholding the Independent Planning Commission's findings that the mine was contrary to the principles of ecologically sustainable development and would have problematic climate impacts.
On March 19, 2021, KEPCO subsequently submitted another appeal to the NSW Court of Appeal. On August 25, 2021, the Court dismissed the appeal. The Court found that the Commission had adequately found that KEPCO had not proposed to minimize GHG emissions and that the State Climate Change Policy concerning GHG emissions was applicable.
On October 14, 2021, KEPCO applied for special leave to appeal the decision to the High Court in a final bid to overturn the refusal. The High Court declined to grant special leave, meaning KEPCO has exhausted all legal avenues to challenge the refusal.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance