- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Kinsella v. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Kinsella v. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
Motion to transfer granted.
Geography
Docket number
1:22-cv-02147
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)United States → Executive Order 12898United States → Fourteenth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited States → Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)United States → Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA)
At issue
Challenge to approval of the South Fork offshore wind energy project.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
11/10/2022
Motion to transfer granted.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia granted a motion to transfer a case challenging the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM’s) approval of the South Fork offshore wind energy project to the Eastern District of New York. The plaintiff claims that BOEM failed to consider adverse environmental impacts, including drinking water impacts of construction and impacts on the Atlantic cod population. The plaintiff also alleges that BOEM found that the project would help New York meet the mandates of the 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) but that BOEM did not take into account that the project allegedly did not comply with the CLCPA’s requirements to minimize costs and to reduce negative impacts on disadvantaged communities. The plaintiff also asserted Coastal Zone Management Act, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Administrative Procedure Act, Freedom of Information Act, and due process claims, as well as a claim of violation of Executive Order 12898, which addressed environmental justice. The district court in the District of Columbia found that public interest factors weighed strongly in favor of transferring the case and outweighed the plaintiff’s preference that venue be in the District of Columbia.
Decision
11/02/2022
Memorandum of law filed in support of emergency motion for a temporary restraining order.
Motion
Summary
Challenge to approval of the South Fork offshore wind energy project.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance