Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Kinsella v. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

About this case

Filing year
2022
Status
Motion to transfer granted.
Docket number
1:22-cv-02147
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesCoastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)United StatesExecutive Order 12898United StatesFourteenth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited StatesFreedom of Information Act (FOIA)United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)United StatesOuter Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA)
At issue
Challenge to approval of the South Fork offshore wind energy project.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
11/10/2022
Motion to transfer granted.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia granted a motion to transfer a case challenging the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM’s) approval of the South Fork offshore wind energy project to the Eastern District of New York. The plaintiff claims that BOEM failed to consider adverse environmental impacts, including drinking water impacts of construction and impacts on the Atlantic cod population. The plaintiff also alleges that BOEM found that the project would help New York meet the mandates of the 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) but that BOEM did not take into account that the project allegedly did not comply with the CLCPA’s requirements to minimize costs and to reduce negative impacts on disadvantaged communities. The plaintiff also asserted Coastal Zone Management Act, Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, Administrative Procedure Act, Freedom of Information Act, and due process claims, as well as a claim of violation of Executive Order 12898, which addressed environmental justice. The district court in the District of Columbia found that public interest factors weighed strongly in favor of transferring the case and outweighed the plaintiff’s preference that venue be in the District of Columbia.
Decision
11/02/2022
Memorandum of law filed in support of emergency motion for a temporary restraining order.
Motion

Summary

Challenge to approval of the South Fork offshore wind energy project.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance