- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Virginia
- /
- Layla H. v. Commonwealth
Layla H. v. Commonwealth
Geography
Year
2022
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2022
Status
Case dismissed.
Geography
Docket number
CL22000632-00
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Virginia Circuit Court (Va. Cir. Ct.)
Case category
Public Trust Claims (US)State Law Claims (US) → Environmentalist Lawsuits (US)
Principal law
United States
At issue
Lawsuit alleging that the permitting of fossil fuel infrastructure by Virginia and Virginia agencies and officials violated youth plaintiffs' rights under the Virginia Constitution.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
09/16/2022
Case dismissed.
A Virginia trial court dismissed a lawsuit brought by youth plaintiffs who alleged that the Commonwealth of Virginia’s permitting of fossil fuel development and infrastructure violated their common law public trust rights and substantive due process rights under the Virginia constitution. As <a href="https://apnews.com/article/richmond-lawsuits-virginia-climate-and-environment-8c9b90ec8dcc33b0419ed6e3fdddd460">reported</a> by the AP, the court ruled from the bench and dismissed the case on sovereign immunity grounds. The plaintiffs said they would appeal the decision.
Press Release
02/09/2022
Complaint filed.
Youth plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in Virginia state court against the Commonwealth of Virginia and state agencies and officials alleging that the defendants’ permitting of fossil fuel infrastructure caused and contributed to the climate crisis and caused injuries to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs asserted that the Virginia Gas and Oil Act’s directive requiring that the Virginia Department of Energy maximize exploration, development, production, recovery, and utilization of Virginia’s fossil fuel resources substantially impaired the plaintiffs’ constitutional and common law jus publicum (i.e., public trust doctrine) rights and violated their substantive due process rights under the Virginia constitution. The complaint also asserted that the defendants’ “historic and ongoing policy and practice of exercising their statutory discretion in such a manner as to favor the permitting of fossil fuel infrastructure projects” substantially impaired the plaintiffs’ jus publicum rights and violated their substantive due process rights. The plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment, as well as in injunctive relief, “[i]f necessary and proper.” They contended that a declaratory judgment would have “immediate practical consequences” and “provide meaningful redress” because the defendants would “abide by any declaratory judgment order and bring their policy and practice of approving permits for fossil fuel infrastructure into constitutional compliance.”
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit alleging that the permitting of fossil fuel infrastructure by Virginia and Virginia agencies and officials violated youth plaintiffs' rights under the Virginia Constitution.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance