- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Montana
- /
- Lighthiser v. Trump
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
08/14/2025
Brief
Brief filed in support of state intervenors' motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).
–
08/13/2025
Decision
States' motion to intervene granted.
The federal district court for the District of Montana granted a motion by 19 states and Guam (state intervenors) to intervene as defendants in a lawsuit brought by youth plaintiffs challenging three executive orders issued by President Trump that the plaintiffs alleged were ultra vires and would deprive them of fundamental rights to life and liberty by increasing use of polluting fossil fuels and slowing the building of energy infrastructure to reduce fossil fuel greenhouse gas emissions. The court found that the state intervenors satisfied criteria both for intervention as of right and permissive intervention. Regarding intervention as of right, the court found that the state intervenors established that their interests in their energy policies, businesses, and employment might be impaired and that they made a sufficient showing that the federal defendants would not adequately represent these interests. The court also ruled that the state intervenors would retain their sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment.
07/08/2025
Motion To Intervene
Brief filed in support of motion to intervene as intervenor-defendants by State of Montana, 18 other states, and one territory.
–
06/25/2025
Decision
Order issued regarding schedule for motion to dismiss and hearing.
The court issued an order setting a schedule for any motion to dismiss and scheduling a hearing on September 16-17, 2025 on the plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction and the defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs had requested an evidentiary hearing on their motion; the court directed that the parties file notice of any expected witness testimony by September 2.
05/29/2025
Complaint
Complaint filed.
Twenty-two youth plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the District of Montana against President Trump and federal agencies and officials alleging that three energy-related executive orders violate their substantive due process rights and are ultra vires. The three executive orders are: Executive Order 14154, “Unleashing American Energy”; Executive Order 14156, “Declaring a National Energy Emergency”; and Executive Order 14261, “Reinvigorating America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Industry and Amending Executive Order 14241.” The plaintiffs alleged that the executive orders’ directive will slow the development of clean energy infrastructure and increase use of fossil fuels, as well as “dismantl[e] the climate science and climate change warning infrastructure of the Nation.” The complaint asserted claims of substantive due process violations of right to life and right to liberty, as well as claims that the executive orders and agency implementation of them were ultra vires exercises of power that “illegally amended, repealed, rescinded, and circumvented” federal statutes, including the 1970 law creating EPA, the Clean Air Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act. The complaint also asserted that the termination of the National Climate Assessment and “wholesale suppression of climate science research and data across the federal government” were ultra vires. In addition, the complaint included a claim that the executive orders and implementing actions were unconstitutional under the state-created danger doctrine. The plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief.
Summary
Youth plaintiffs' lawsuit challenging Trump energy executive orders as violative of substantive due process rights and ultra vires.