- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Utah
- /
- Living Rivers v. Hoffman
Living Rivers v. Hoffman
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Notice of voluntary dismissal filed.
Geography
Docket number
4:19-cv-00074
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the District of Utah (D. Utah)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to 130 oil and gas lease sales on public land in Utah for failure to consider indirect and cumulative greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impacts.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
03/19/2020
Notice of voluntary dismissal filed.
In light of the court's dismissal of a similar case (<a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/9033/">Friends of Cedar Mesa v. U.S. Department of the Interior</a>) as moot, the plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal.
Notice
09/12/2019
Complaint filed.
Three conservation groups challenged 130 oil and gas lease sales covering 175,357 acres of public lands in Utah for failing to consider indirect and cumulative greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impacts. The complaint asserted that the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews for the lease sales, which were conducted between 2014 and 2018, considered no indirect greenhouse gas emissions other than carbon dioxide emissions from combustion and failed to analyze downstream emissions for non-carbon dioxide emissions and emissions that occurred after drilling but prior to combustion. The complaint also alleged that the NEPA reviews did not quantify cumulative emissions of other past, present, or reasonably foreseeable oil and gas lease sales but instead provided “only broad and generic statements regarding the nature of the climate crisis.”
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to 130 oil and gas lease sales on public land in Utah for failure to consider indirect and cumulative greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impacts.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance