On October 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of Pakistan disposed of a monitoring matter arising from a petition concerning the illegal cutting of 218 shisham trees. The Court addressed the broader decline in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's forest cover and stated that deforestation contributes to landslides and flooding, reduces the sequestration of greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels, and exacerbates climate change in a country highly vulnerable to its effects. The Court had required the provincial government to report on the Forest Department's budget, staffing, authorized and illegal timber cutting, reforestation measures, and forest-cover measurement for the preceding five years.
The order applied Article 9A of the Constitution, inserted three days earlier, which recognizes a right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment. It also reiterated that Article 9's right to life had already been interpreted to encompass a sustainable environment. After government counsel committed to promote and implement sustainable environmental practices, the Court disposed of the matter on those terms.
- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Pakistan
- /
- Mehar Badshah v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Mehar Badshah v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
About this case
Filing year
2015
Status
Decided
Geography
Court/admin entity
Pakistan
Case category
Suits against governments (Global) → Protecting biodiversity and ecosystems (Global)
Principal law
Pakistan
Topics
, ,  
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
10/24/2024
On October 24, 2024, the Supreme Court of Pakistan disposed of a monitoring matter arising from a petition concerning the illegal cutting of 218 shisham trees. The Court addressed the broader decline in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's forest cover and stated that deforestation contributes to landslides and flooding, reduces the sequestration of greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels, and exacerbates climate change in a country highly vulnerable to its effects. The Court had required the provincial government to report on the Forest Department's budget, staffing, authorized and illegal timber cutting, reforestation measures, and forest-cover measurement for the preceding five years.
The order applied Article 9A of the Constitution, inserted three days earlier, which recognizes a right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment. It also reiterated that Article 9's right to life had already been interpreted to encompass a sustainable environment. After government counsel committed to promote and implement sustainable environmental practices, the Court disposed of the matter on those terms.
Decision
Summary
 Topics mentioned most in this case  Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience