Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission

About this case

Filing year
2008
Status
Opinion issued.
Docket number
A10-812
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsMinnesota Court of Appeals (Minn. Ct. App.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US)State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United StatesMinnesota Environmental Policy Act
At issue
Challenge to environmental impact statement prepared in conjunction with 313-mile petroleum pipeline.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
12/04/2010
Opinion issued.
An environmental nonprofit filed a lawsuit challenging a 313-mile long crude oil pipeline in Minnesota, alleging that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) violated the Minnesota Environmental Protection Act by, among other things, not considering the GHG emissions from refining the tar sands from which the petroleum would be extracted.  A state district court granted summary judgment in favor of MPUC. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the state regulations did not require that MPUC take into account emissions from the tar sands.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to environmental impact statement prepared in conjunction with 313-mile petroleum pipeline.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance