Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Mothers Against Toxic Housing v. California Department of Toxic Substances Control

About this case

Filing year
2021
Status
Judgment for respondent affirmed.
Docket number
A166861
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsCalifornia Court of Appeals (Cal. Ct. App.)
Case category
Adaptation (US)Reverse Impact Assessment (US)State Law Claims (US)State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United StatesCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control's review for the agency's approval of a Prospective Purchaser Agreement for an 86-acre site.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
05/16/2024
Judgment for respondent affirmed.
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the rejection of a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) challenge to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) approval of a Prospective Purchaser Agreement (PPA) for an 86-acre site in the City of Richmond. DTSC previously adopted a negative declaration for a Feasibility Study & Remedial Action Plan (FS/RAP) covering a portion of the site. The petitioners challenging the PPA approval alleged, among other things, that 2020 guidelines released by the State of California significantly increased the amount of expected sea level rise and that the increased rate of sea level rise would result in new or increased impacts from implementation of the selected remediation option. The appellate court agreed with the court below that the 2020 guidelines did not constitute new information that was not considered when the FS/RAP was approved, or that the information would require major revisions to the negative declaration. The court also noted that the plaintiffs had not addressed previous decisions holding that sea level rise is not an impact on the environment caused by the project.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control's review for the agency's approval of a Prospective Purchaser Agreement for an 86-acre site.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Risk
Impacted group
Economic sector
Finance