- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- National Petrochemical & Refiners Association v. Goldstene
National Petrochemical & Refiners Association v. Goldstene
Geography
Year
2010
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2010
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
1:10-CV-163-LJO-BAM
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (E.D. Cal.)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US) → Commerce Clause (US)
Principal law
United States → California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32)United States → Clean Air Act (CAA)United States → Commerce ClauseUnited States → Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA)United States → Supremacy Clause
At issue
Challenge to California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard on constitutional grounds.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
02/02/2010
Complaint filed.
Industry and business groups filed a lawsuit challenging California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), alleging that it violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution because it interfered with interstate commerce. The
California Air Resources Board adopted the standard in April 2009. The LCFS measured the level of greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production, distribution, and consumption of gasoline and diesel fuels and
their alternatives. It was designed to cut the average carbon intensity of fuels by 10% over the next 11 years.
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard on constitutional grounds.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance