- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Wisconsin
- /
- National Wildlife Refuge Association v. Rural Utilities Service
National Wildlife Refuge Association v. Rural Utilities Service
Geography
Date
2024
Document type
Litigation
Part of
About this cases
Filing year
2024
Status
Preliminary injunctions vacated and case remanded.
Geography
Docket number
24-1492
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Seventh Circuit (7th Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims → NEPAFederal Statutory Claims → Other Statutes and Regulations
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)United States → National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997
At issue
Challenge to federal agency actions that would facilitate development of a high-voltage transmission line from Dubuque County, Iowa, to Middleton, Wisconsin, passing through the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge.
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
11/06/2024
Preliminary injunctions vacated and case remanded.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that appeal of preliminary injunctions halting a wildlife refuge land exchange and construction of a high-voltage transmission line through the refuge was moot after the injunction was stayed and the exchange and construction of the line were completed. The Seventh Circuit remanded the case to the district court for a determination of whether the plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction was also moot. The plaintiffs’ claims included that that the defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act, including by failing to take a hard look at climate change impacts of the project.
Decision
05/02/2024
Effectiveness of preliminary injunction stayed.
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the effectiveness of a preliminary injunction that barred federal defendants and developers of a transmission line from taking action to close an agreement to exchange land within the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge for land held by the developers to facilitate construction of the transmission line through the refuge. Conservation groups argue that the federal defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act, including by failing to consider climate change impacts.
Decision
Summary
Challenge to federal agency actions that would facilitate development of a high-voltage transmission line from Dubuque County, Iowa, to Middleton, Wisconsin, passing through the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge.