- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment granted, defendants' motion for summary judgment denied, and critical habitat designation vacated and remanded.
Geography
Docket number
1:21-cv-00770
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection Statutes (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Endangered Species Act (ESA)
At issue
Lawsuit challenging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's determination that designation of critical habitat for the rusty patch bumble bee would not be prudent and seeking to compel designation of critical habitat for the species.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
08/11/2023
Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment granted, defendants' motion for summary judgment denied, and critical habitat designation vacated and remanded.
The federal district court for the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service did not set forth a reasoned basis for its decision not to designate critical habitat for the rusty patched bumble bee, which was listed as endangered in 2017. The court found that “[t]he record does not demonstrate that critical habitat ‘would not be beneficial’ in any way to the bee.” The court said that even if habitat loss and degradation were not a primary threat to the species, the FWS did not suggest that habitat loss was not “a” threat. The court also said the FWS’s characterization of the species as a “habitat generalist” did not answer the question of whether it could gain any potential benefits from critical habitat designation. Finally, the court rejected the contention that ongoing Section 7 consultation in areas occupied by the bee made critical habitat designation not beneficial.
Decision
03/24/2021
Complaint filed.
Three organizations filed a lawsuit in federal court in the District of Columbia to compel the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to designate critical habitat for the rusty patch bumble bee, which was listed as endangered in 2017. The plaintiffs alleged that the bee, “[o]nce common throughout the midwestern and northeastern United States, northward into Canada, the bee has disappeared from the vast majority of its native range and now stands on the brink of extinction, owing to habitat loss and destruction, pesticide use, disease, parasites, and climate change.” The plaintiffs asserted that the FWS’s reasons for determining that designation of critical habitat would not be prudent violated the Endangered Species Act and the Administrative Procedure Act, as well as FWS regulations. The FWS made its determination that designation would not be prudent after reaching a settlement in an <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/natural-resources-defense-council-inc-v-bernhardt/">earlier case</a> with Natural Resource Defense Council in 2019 that set a schedule for a determination on critical habitat.
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit challenging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's determination that designation of critical habitat for the rusty patch bumble bee would not be prudent and seeking to compel designation of critical habitat for the species.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance