- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. Mexichem Fluo...
Litigation
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Mexichem Fluor, Inc.
About this case
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Document
Summary
06/25/2018
Petition For Writ Of Certiorari
Petition for writ of certiorari filed.
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court seeking review of the D.C. Circuit decision striking down key components of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) final rule prohibiting or restricting use of certain hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) as replacements for ozone-depleting substances due to the HFCs’ high global warming potential. NRDC had intervened to defend the rule in the D.C. Circuit. NRDC’s petition presented the question of “[w]hether EPA has authority under Section 612 to prohibit use of dangerous but non-ozone-depleting substitutes by any person, including by product manufacturers who began using such substitutes before EPA placed them on the prohibited list.” NRDC also argued that the D.C. Circuit majority’s interpretation was at odds with the statute and destroyed a “core Clean Air Act program.”
Summary
Challenge to prohibitions and restrictions on use of certain hydrofluorocarbons in Significant New Alternatives Policy program.