- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Iowa
- /
- Navigator Heartland Greenway LLC v. Bremer County
Navigator Heartland Greenway LLC v. Bremer County
Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
Joint stipulation for dismissal without prejudice filed.
Geography
Docket number
6:23-cv-2030
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa (N.D. Iowa)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US) → Other Constitutional Claims (US)State Law Claims (US) → Industry Lawsuits (US)
Principal law
United States → Inverse CondemnationUnited States → Pipeline Safety ActUnited States → Supremacy ClauseUnited States → Tortious Interference
At issue
Carbon dioxide pipeline developer's lawsuit challenging county ordinance that regulates pipeline.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
Search results
10/20/2023
Joint stipulation for dismissal without prejudice filed.
On the same day that Navigator CO2 <a href="https://navigatorco2.com/press-releases/heartland-greenway-project-update">announced</a> that it had decided to cancel its carbon dioxide pipeline project (known as the Heartland Greenway project), the company joined in filing stipulations of dismissal without prejudice of its lawsuits challenging Iowa county laws that would have regulated the pipeline. The company cited “the unpredictable nature of the regulatory and government processes involved, particularly in South Dakota and Iowa,” as the reason for the cancellation.
Stipulation
–
04/28/2023
Amended complaint filed.
Complaint
–
04/12/2023
Complaint filed.
The developer of a proposed interstate pipeline that would transport captured carbon dioxide across Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Nebraska, and South Dakota from emitting facilities to storage filed lawsuits in federal court in Iowa challenging two counties’ zoning ordinances that the developer said unlawfully usurped federal and state regulatory authority. The complaint asserted that both federal and state law preempted the ordinances and sought a declaration that the ordinances had no effect because they were unlawful exercises of power. The developer also asserted claims of inverse condemnation and tortious interference with contractual relationships and prospective business advantages. The developer sought preliminary and permanent injunctive relief enjoining the counties from enforcing or implementing the ordinances, similar ordinances, or any other requirement that would regulate any aspect of the project, including safety, location, or routing.
Complaint
–
Summary
Carbon dioxide pipeline developer's lawsuit challenging county ordinance that regulates pipeline.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance