Challenge to approval of application to build 130-mile rail line in Montana to haul coal.
- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Northern Plains Resource Council v. Surface Transportation Board
Northern Plains Resource Council v. Surface Transportation Board
Geography
Year
1997
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
1997
Status
Reverses and remands in part the trial court's decision approving the Tongue River Railroad Co.'s proposed 130-mile railroad lines (TRRC II and III).
Geography
Docket number
97-70037, 97-70099, 97-70217, 07-74348
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)
Principal law
United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to approval of application to build 130-mile rail line in Montana to haul coal.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
12/29/2011
Reverses and remands in part the trial court's decision approving the Tongue River Railroad Co.'s proposed 130-mile railroad lines (TRRC II and III).
The Ninth Circuit reversed in part a decision by the Surface Transportation Board approving an application from a railroad company to build a 130-mile railroad line in southwestern Montana to haul coal, holding that the agency failed to take the requisite “hard look” at several environmental issues raised by the project. Specifically, the court held that the agency’s environmental impact statement (EIS) concerning the proposed line adequately considered the cumulative effect of the coal bed methane wells and the railroad on air quality and wildlife. However, the court held that the EIS ignored the combined impacts of future well development and coal mining projects in the area, improperly relying on a five-year timeline which resulted in a faulty analysis. The court also held that the EIS did not provide baseline data for many wildlife and sensitive plant species.
Decision
Summary
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance