- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Florida
- /
- Office of the Attorney General v. Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.
Office of the Attorney General v. Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.
Geography
Year
2025
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
236237226
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Fla. Cir. Ct.
Case category
State Law Claims → Other Types of State Law Cases
Principal law
United States
At issue
Florida Attorney General's lawsuit alleging that proxy advisers used their influence on investors to push a "dogmatic agenda," including by insisting that climate change influence companies' decision-making.
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
11/20/2025
Complaint filed.
The Florida Attorney General filed a lawsuit in Florida Circuit Court against the proxy advisers Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (ISS) and Glass, Lewis & Co. LLC (Glass Lewis) to enjoin alleged violations of the Florida Antitrust Act and the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. The Attorney General’s complaint alleged that the ISS and Glass Lewis “dominate” the industry of advising institutional investors on how individual shareholders should vote and that they use that influence “to push their own dogmatic agenda,” which the complaint alleges includes “an insistence that concerns about global climate change should influence every company’s decision-making.” The complaint asserted that the defendants deceived and misled Florida consumers, that their activities constituted “unfair practices,” and that they engaged in conduct constituting a contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade within Florida. The Attorney General requested declaratory and injunctive relief, civil penalties, attorneys’ fees, and actual and treble damages.
Complaint
Summary
Florida Attorney General's lawsuit alleging that proxy advisers used their influence on investors to push a "dogmatic agenda," including by insisting that climate change influence companies' decision-making.