- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Oklahoma
- /
- Oklahoma v. McCarthy
Oklahoma v. McCarthy
About this case
Filing year
2015
Status
Consent motion for voluntary dismissal of appeal filed.
Geography
Docket number
15-5066
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (10th Cir.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Clean Air Act (US) → Industry Lawsuits (US) → Clean Power Plan (US)
Principal law
United States → Clean Air Act (CAA)
At issue
Challenge to proposed regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants.
Topics
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
09/18/2015
Consent motion for voluntary dismissal of appeal filed.
Oklahoma filed a consent motion in the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals for voluntary dismissal of its appeal of a federal district court’s dismissal of its challenge to the proposed Clean Power Plan. Oklahoma indicated that because the Tenth Circuit had denied its request for a stay pending appeal, EPA would formally promulgate the final Clean Power Plan in the next several months. Oklahoma said that final promulgation of the rule would deprive the Tenth Circuit of continuing jurisdiction since the Clean Air Act vests exclusive jurisdiction over challenges to final rules in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Consent Decree/Order
08/24/2015
Order issued.
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Oklahoma’s request for an injunction pending the state’s appeal of a district court’s dismissal of its challenge to the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Clean Power Plan. Oklahoma filed its lawsuit in the Northern District of Oklahoma before EPA finalized its rule regulating carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants but after the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed other lawsuits that challenged the proposed plan. The district court dismissed Oklahoma’s lawsuit less than three weeks after it was filed, noting that there was no exception to the requirement for final agency action and that exclusive jurisdiction for review would lie with the D.C. Circuit.
Decision
Summary
Challenge to proposed regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk