Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development and Others v. Attorney General of Canada and Imperial Oil

Geography
Year
2008
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2008
Status
Application granted
Court/admin entity
CanadaFederal Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global)Environmental assessment and permitting (Global)Natural resource extraction (Global)
Principal law
CanadaEnvironmental Assessment Act (S.B.C. 2018, c 51)
At issue
Challenge to government panel approval of oil sands mine
Topics
, ,

Documents

Summary

Federal Court of Canada found legal errors in a government joint review panel’s environmental assessment of the Kearl Tar Sands Project. Ecojustice and several non-profit organizations challenged the panel’s approval of the project, alleging that it had failed to seriously consider the climate change impacts of the project. The court agreed with the petitioner, holding that the panel failed to adequately support their conclusion that the project would cause only insignificant environmental harm.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance