- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- People v. PepsiCo, Inc.
People v. PepsiCo, Inc.
About this case
Filing year
2024
Status
Complaint filed.
Geography
Docket number
24STCV28450
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Enforcement Cases (US)
Principal law
United States → State Law—Nuisance
At issue
Action against beverage producers alleging that they generated plastic pollution that created a nuisance and made deceptive representations regarding single-use plastic and chemical recycling.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
10/30/2024
Complaint filed.
Los Angeles County Counsel Dawyn R. Harrison filed an action against PepsiCo, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, and companies that manufactured and distributed Pepsi and Coca-Cola beverages. The suit alleged, on behalf of the People of the State of California, that the defendants created harmful plastic pollution and waste that created a nuisance. The People also asserted that the defendants violated the California Unfair Competition Law by making deceptive representations regarding single-use plastic and chemical recycling, by failing to disclose the presence of microplastics in their products and the risks of microplastics, and by creating a public nuisance. In addition, the complaint asserted a violation of the California False Advertising Law. The suit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, abatement of the public nuisance, restitution, civil penalties, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Plastic pollution harms alleged in the complaint including climate change-related harms, including that plastic pollution diminishes the capacity of ecosystems to adapt to climate change and that some plastic resins release greenhouse gases as they break down in the environment. In addition, the complaint alleged that recycling was incapable of eliminating plastic production’s impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions, and that “advanced recycling” has higher greenhouse gas emissions than traditional, mechanical recycling.
Complaint
Summary
Action against beverage producers alleging that they generated plastic pollution that created a nuisance and made deceptive representations regarding single-use plastic and chemical recycling.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance