- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- People v. Southern California Gas Co.
People v. Southern California Gas Co.
Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
Attorney general and SoCalGas agreed to consent judgment.
Geography
Docket number
23CV040344
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Enforcement Cases (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Marketing Claims ActUnited States → California False Advertising LawUnited States → California Unfair Competition Law
At issue
Action alleging that defendant misled consumers about the environmental attributes of natural gas.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
08/11/2023
Attorney general and SoCalGas agreed to consent judgment.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) agreed to a consent judgment to resolve claims that SoCalGas misled consumers with statements that its natural gas was “renewable.” The Attorney General alleged that while SoCalGas had set targets to increase the proportion of renewable natural gas (RNG)—biomethane derived from landfills and dairy operations—in its portfolio, the “vast majority” of the company’s natural gas was not renewable. The Attorney General asserted that SoCalGas’s statements violated California’s Unfair Competition Law and Environmental Marketing Claims Act. The consent judgment permanently enjoined SoCalGas from stating or implying that its natural gas is “renewable” unless the statements comply with the FTC Green Guides. SoCalGas also must publish a statement on its website for at least 12 months that, among other things, describes the percentage of its natural gas deliveries that is RNG. SoCalGas also must pay an $87,500 civil penalty and pay an additional $87,500 that is to be disbursed to the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Justice Small Grants Program.
Consent Decree/Order
Summary
Action alleging that defendant misled consumers about the environmental attributes of natural gas.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance