- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Delaware
- /
- Perri v. Croskrey
Perri v. Croskrey
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Notice of voluntary dismissal filed by plaintiffs.
Geography
Docket number
1:21-cv-01423
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District of Delaware (D. Del.)
Case category
Securities and Financial Regulation
Principal law
United States → Breach of Fiduciary DutyUnited States → Securities Act of 1933/Securities Exchange Act of 1934United States → State Law—Unjust EnrichmentUnited States → Waste
At issue
Stockholder derivative action against board of directors and upper management at a company that produces a "purportedly biodegradable plastic alternative."
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Summary
Document
11/20/2023
Stipulation
Proceedings stayed pending resolution of appeal in <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/case/rosencrants-v-danimer-scientific-inc/">Eastern District of New York proceeding</a>.
–
10/06/2021
Complaint
Complaint filed.
A stockholder derivative action was filed in federal district court in Delaware against members of the board of directors and upper management for Danimer Scientific, Inc., a company that produces polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), which the complaint described as “a purportedly biodegradable plastic alternative used in a range of plastic applications.” The complaint alleged that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties by failing to correct false and misleading statements and omissions of material fact that, among other things, overstated the products’ biodegradability. The complaint cited a report released by an investment firm in April 2021 that noted “inconsistencies” in Danimer’s claims regarding its business and operations. Among other things, the report stated that PHA bioplastics in anaerobic environments release the greenhouse gas methane. The complaint alleged that Danimer’s stock price fell after release of this report, as well as after the publication of a second report. The complaint asserted claims of violations of the Securities and Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, and waste of corporate assets. The suit’s allegations are similar to those in a securities class action brought in the federal district court for the Eastern District of New York.
Summary
Stockholder derivative action against board of directors and upper management at a company that produces a "purportedly biodegradable plastic alternative."