Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Portland General Electric Co. v. NorthWestern Co.

About this case

Filing year
2021
Status
Final judgment awarded to plaintiffs on first, second, third, fourth, and fifth claims.
Docket number
1:21-cv-00047
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the District of Montana (D. Mont.)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US)Commerce Clause (US)Constitutional Claims (US)Other Constitutional Claims (US)
Principal law
United StatesCommerce ClauseUnited StatesContracts ClauseUnited StatesFederal Arbitration ActUnited StatesSupremacy Clause
At issue
Lawsuit brought by out-of-state owners of Montana coal-fired power plant against other owners and Montana Attorney General challenging constitutionality of state laws that created barriers to closure of plant.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
11/15/2022
Final judgment awarded to plaintiffs on first, second, third, fourth, and fifth claims.
Decision
10/19/2022
Findings and recommendations adopted in full and plaintiffs' motions for partial summary judgment granted.
The federal district court for the District of Montana granted a motion for partial summary judgment by four out-of-state owners of a coal-fired power plant in Colstrip, Montana who intended to transition towards closure of the plant to comply with Oregon and Washington laws requiring electric utilities to eliminate use of coal-fired resources. The out-of-state owners—who owned a 70% interest in the plant and owned and operated the plant pursuant to a 1981 Ownership and Operation Agreement with two companies that each owned 30% interests in generating units—challenged the constitutionality of Montana laws enacted in 2021 that, among other things, require arbitration in a Montana venue under the Montana Uniform Arbitration Act for agreements concerning electrical generation facilities and require consent of all co-owners for the permanent closure of a generating unit at an electrical generation facility. The companies that owned 30% interests testified in support of the bills and were defendants in this action, along with the Montana Attorney General. The court determined that the arbitration law violated the U.S. and Montana Constitutions’ Contract Clauses and was preempted under the Federal Arbitration Act, and that the law requiring consent of all co-owners violated the dormant Commerce Clause and the U.S. Constitution’s Contract Clause.
Decision
09/28/2022
Magistrate judge recommended that plaintiffs' motions for partial summary judgment be granted.
Report And Recommendation
09/07/2021
Brief filed by Talen Montana, LLC in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Opposition

Summary

Lawsuit brought by out-of-state owners of Montana coal-fired power plant against other owners and Montana Attorney General challenging constitutionality of state laws that created barriers to closure of plant.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance