- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Montana
- /
- Portland General Electric Co. v. NorthWestern Co.
Portland General Electric Co. v. NorthWestern Co.
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Final judgment awarded to plaintiffs on first, second, third, fourth, and fifth claims.
Geography
Docket number
1:21-cv-00047
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Montana (D. Mont.)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US) → Commerce Clause (US)Constitutional Claims (US) → Other Constitutional Claims (US)
Principal law
United States → Commerce ClauseUnited States → Contracts ClauseUnited States → Federal Arbitration ActUnited States → Supremacy Clause
At issue
Lawsuit brought by out-of-state owners of Montana coal-fired power plant against other owners and Montana Attorney General challenging constitutionality of state laws that created barriers to closure of plant.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
11/15/2022
Final judgment awarded to plaintiffs on first, second, third, fourth, and fifth claims.
Decision
10/19/2022
Findings and recommendations adopted in full and plaintiffs' motions for partial summary judgment granted.
The federal district court for the District of Montana granted a motion for partial summary judgment by four out-of-state owners of a coal-fired power plant in Colstrip, Montana who intended to transition towards closure of the plant to comply with Oregon and Washington laws requiring electric utilities to eliminate use of coal-fired resources. The out-of-state owners—who owned a 70% interest in the plant and owned and operated the plant pursuant to a 1981 Ownership and Operation Agreement with two companies that each owned 30% interests in generating units—challenged the constitutionality of Montana laws enacted in 2021 that, among other things, require arbitration in a Montana venue under the Montana Uniform Arbitration Act for agreements concerning electrical generation facilities and require consent of all co-owners for the permanent closure of a generating unit at an electrical generation facility. The companies that owned 30% interests testified in support of the bills and were defendants in this action, along with the Montana Attorney General. The court determined that the arbitration law violated the U.S. and Montana Constitutions’ Contract Clauses and was preempted under the Federal Arbitration Act, and that the law requiring consent of all co-owners violated the dormant Commerce Clause and the U.S. Constitution’s Contract Clause.
Decision
09/28/2022
Magistrate judge recommended that plaintiffs' motions for partial summary judgment be granted.
Report And Recommendation
10/13/2021
Motion for preliminary injunction granted.
Decision
09/07/2021
Brief filed by Talen Montana, LLC in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
Opposition
05/19/2021
First amended complaint filed.
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit brought by out-of-state owners of Montana coal-fired power plant against other owners and Montana Attorney General challenging constitutionality of state laws that created barriers to closure of plant.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance