- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Illinois
- /
- Protect Our Parks, Inc. v. Buttigieg
Protect Our Parks, Inc. v. Buttigieg
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Counts VI, VIII, IX, XI, XII, XIII, and XV dismissed with prejudice and Count VII dismissed without prejudice.
Geography
Docket number
1:21-cv-02006
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Actions seeking adaptation measures (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Clean Water Act (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Clean Water Act (CWA)United States → Department of Transportation Act (Section 4(f))United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)United States → National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)United States → Rivers and Harbors ActUnited States → Urban Park and Recreation Recovery Act
At issue
Challenge to federal approvals for the construction of the Obama Presidential Center in Jackson Park in Chicago.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
03/29/2022
Counts VI, VIII, IX, XI, XII, XIII, and XV dismissed with prejudice and Count VII dismissed without prejudice.
Decision
08/12/2021
Memorandum opinion and order issued stating reasons for court's denial of motion for preliminary injunction.
Decision
04/14/2021
Complaint filed.
Two not-for-profit organizations and five individuals filed a lawsuit in the federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois asserting that federal approvals of the construction of the Obama Presidential Center in Jackson Park in Chicago failed to comply with “the letter and spirit” of federal statutes, including Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the Urban Park and Recreation Recovery Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act. The plaintiffs’ allegations also included that the Obama Presidential Center would have significant and permanent impacts on the Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration Project at Jackson Park, a large project led by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and designed to address climate change’s impacts on the South Side of Chicago, among other environmental functions. The plaintiffs asserted that the Corps’ approval of modifications to the project violated the Rivers and Harbors Act and the Clean Water Act.
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to federal approvals for the construction of the Obama Presidential Center in Jackson Park in Chicago.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance