- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Public Watchdogs v. Southern California Edison Co.
Public Watchdogs v. Southern California Edison Co.
Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
First amended complaint dismissed with prejudice and motion for preliminary injunction denied.
Geography
Docket number
3:19-cv-01635
Court/admin entity
United States → United States District Court for the Southern District of California (S.D. Cal.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Actions seeking adaptation measures (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → State Law–Strict LiabilityUnited States → State Law—Nuisance
At issue
Challenge to decommissioning plan for nuclear generating station in California based in part on climate change risks.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
12/03/2019
First amended complaint dismissed with prejudice and motion for preliminary injunction denied.
Decision
09/24/2019
First amended complaint filed.
Complaint
08/30/2019
Plaintiffs filed amended motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order.
Motion
08/29/2019
Complaint filed.
A nonprofit group filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of California to block implementation of the decommissioning plan for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) in California. The defendants are the utilities that own SONGS, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and the manufacturer of canisters used for storage of spent nuclear fuel. The complaint asserted that the NRC’s approval of the plan violated the Administrative Procedure Act and that the plan constituted a public nuisance. The complaint also asserted a strict products liability claim against the canister manufacturer. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants were “risking the lives of millions of California residents and the prospect of irreparable harm to the environment by removing spent nuclear fuel from a storage location specifically designed and used for that purpose for decades,” transporting it into defective canisters, and “dropping it into holes a mere 108 feet from one of California’s most populated public beaches, within a tsunami zone, surrounded by active fault lines.” Among the risks alleged in the complaint were that if sea levels rise at the rate projected by climate change experts, the results could be “catastrophic.”
Complaint
Summary
Challenge to decommissioning plan for nuclear generating station in California based in part on climate change risks.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance