- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Utah
- /
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. Shepherd
Salt Lake City Corp. v. Shepherd
Geography
Year
2023
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2023
Status
Stipulated dismissal submitted for U.S. Forest Service defendants.
Geography
Docket number
2:23-cv-00893
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the District of Utah (D. Utah)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US) → NEPA (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Other Statutes and Regulations (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Department of Transportation Act (Section 4(f))United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)United States → Wilderness Act
At issue
Challenge to federal and Utah defendants' review and authorization of transportation improvements in Little Cottonwood Canyon.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
03/18/2024
Forest Service Dismissed from Challenge to Transportation Improvements for Route to Utah Ski Resorts
Stipulated dismissal submitted for U.S. Forest Service defendants.
The parties stipulated to the dismissal without prejudice of U.S. Forest Service defendants because those defendants had not adopted the final EIS or completed any final agency action related to the project.
Stipulation
12/11/2023
Petition for review filed.
In December 2023, Salt Lake City, Sandy City, and the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy filed a lawsuit challenging the review and authorization of transportation improvements in Little Cottonwood Canyon. The plaintiffs alleged the improvements would increase overall summer and winter use throughout the canyon, include the Alta and Snowbird ski resorts, and cause an array of impacts. The improvements included a gondola to provide access to the ski resorts, as well as road widening and other physical improvements to a state road and enhanced bus service and tolling. The plaintiffs alleged that federal defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Wilderness Act of 1964, Section 4(f) of the Transportation Act of 1966, and the Administrative Procedure Act. Their NEPA claims included that the defendants failed to adequately evaluate the project’s greenhouse gas emissions or to consider the effects of a changing climate on the need for and operation of the project.
Petition
Summary
Challenge to federal and Utah defendants' review and authorization of transportation improvements in Little Cottonwood Canyon.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance