- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- San Francisco Baykeeper v. EPA
San Francisco Baykeeper v. EPA
Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Motion for voluntary dismissal granted.
Geography
Docket number
20-17367
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)United States → United States Federal Courts
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Actions seeking adaptation measures (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US) → Clean Water Act (US)
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Clean Water Act (CWA)
At issue
Challenge to EPA's determination that the Redwood City Salt Ponds were not within the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act.
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
04/19/2021
Motion for voluntary dismissal granted.
Seven weeks after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew its appeal of a district court’s order that vacated a negative jurisdictional determination under the Clean Water Act for the Redwood City Salt Ponds along San Francisco Bay, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a motion for voluntary dismissal filed by the limited liability company that requested the jurisdictional determination. San Francisco Baykeeper and other plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that the negative jurisdictional determination would exacerbate the consequences of sea level rise and impair California’s ability to mitigate sea level rise impacts, though the district court’s decision did not address this issue, focusing instead on EPA’s determination that the salt ponds had been transformed into “fast land” prior to enactment of the Clean Water Act.
Decision
04/13/2021
Unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Redwood City Plant Site, LLC.
Motion
Summary
Challenge to EPA's determination that the Redwood City Salt Ponds were not within the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act.