Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

San Francisco Baykeeper v. EPA

Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2019
Status
Motion for voluntary dismissal granted.
Docket number
20-17367
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)United StatesUnited States Federal Courts
Case category
Adaptation (US)Actions seeking adaptation measures (US)Federal Statutory Claims (US)Clean Water Act (US)
Principal law
United StatesAdministrative Procedure Act (APA)United StatesClean Water Act (CWA)
At issue
Challenge to EPA's determination that the Redwood City Salt Ponds were not within the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act.

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
04/19/2021
Motion for voluntary dismissal granted.
Seven weeks after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) withdrew its appeal of a district court’s order that vacated a negative jurisdictional determination under the Clean Water Act for the Redwood City Salt Ponds along San Francisco Bay, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a motion for voluntary dismissal filed by the limited liability company that requested the jurisdictional determination. San Francisco Baykeeper and other plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that the negative jurisdictional determination would exacerbate the consequences of sea level rise and impair California’s ability to mitigate sea level rise impacts, though the district court’s decision did not address this issue, focusing instead on EPA’s determination that the salt ponds had been transformed into “fast land” prior to enactment of the Clean Water Act.
Decision
04/13/2021
Unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Redwood City Plant Site, LLC.
Motion

Summary

Challenge to EPA's determination that the Redwood City Salt Ponds were not within the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act.