Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. Regents of the University of California

About this case

Filing year
2019
Status
Petitions for writ of mandate granted.
Docket number
RG19022887
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsCalifornia Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US)State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United StatesCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to environmental review for the Upper Hearst Development Plan for Goldman School of Public Policy and Minor Amendment to the 2020 Long Range Development Plan for Berkeley, including failure to assess or mitigate impacts on climate change.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
08/23/2021
Petitions for writ of mandate granted.
The court found that the university's environmental review was legally insufficient and that a reduced enrollment alternative should have been considered. Climate change issues were not discussed in the court's decision.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to environmental review for the Upper Hearst Development Plan for Goldman School of Public Policy and Minor Amendment to the 2020 Long Range Development Plan for Berkeley, including failure to assess or mitigate impacts on climate change.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance