- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- District of Columbia
- /
- Save Long Beach Island, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Commerce
Save Long Beach Island, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Commerce
Geography
Date
2025
Document type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2025
Status
Motion for stay or preliminary injunction denied.
Geography
Docket number
1:25-cv-02214
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → D.D.C.
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims → Endangered Species Act and Other Wildlife Protection StatutesFederal Statutory Claims → NEPAFederal Statutory Claims → Other Statutes and Regulations
Principal law
United States → Administrative Procedure Act (APA)United States → Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA)United States → National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)United States → Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA)
At issue
Lawsuit seeking to vacate federal authorizations for the Empire Wind offshore wind project.
Documents
Filing Date
Type
Action Taken
Summary
Document
10/24/2025
Decision
Motion for stay or preliminary injunction denied.
A federal district court in the District of Columbia denied a motion for a preliminary injunction blocking further work on the Empire Wind I offshore wind project off the coast of New York and New Jersey. The plaintiffs allege that federal authorizations for the project violated the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NEPA, and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. Their preliminary injunction motion focused only their MMPA claim. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish irreparable harm based on alleged disruptions to bottlenose dolphins that would negatively impact one plaintiff’s whale and dolphin watching business and deprive another plaintiff of aesthetic enjoyment from observing whales and dolphins. In addition, the court found that the equities did not favor the plaintiffs. The court noted that halting construction “would impose substantial costs and likely upend Empire Wind’s ability to finish the project,” which had been under construction for more than a year, and would therefore substantially harm the defendants as well as public interests in jobs and clean energy. The court was not persuaded by the plaintiffs’ arguments that the balance of equities nonetheless tipped in their favor, including their contention that “the potential harm of pausing construction is overstated because ‘the putative climate benefits of the project are highly uncertain.’”
09/25/2025
Reply
Reply filed by intervenor-defendant Empire Wind in support of motion to dismiss.
–
09/05/2025
Opposition
Opposition filed by federal defendants to plaintiffs' motion for an administrative stay or preliminary injunction.
–
09/05/2025
Motion To Dismiss
Memorandum filed in support of intervenor-defendant Empire Wind's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim.
–
09/05/2025
Opposition
Memorandum filed by intervenor-defendant Empire Wind in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for an administrative stay or preliminary injunction.
–
09/05/2025
Opposition
Opposition filed by federal defendants to plaintiffs' motion for an administrative stay or preliminary injunction.
–
08/21/2025
Motion
Memorandum of law filed by plaintiffs in support of motion to stay final agency action or, alternatively, for preliminary action.
–
Summary
Lawsuit seeking to vacate federal authorizations for the Empire Wind offshore wind project.