Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Shell Gulf of Mexico, Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.

Geography
Year
2012
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2012
Status
Order issued granting motion to dismiss in part and granting Shell's motion for additional preliminary injunctive relief.
Docket number
3:12-cv-00042-SLG
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States District Court for the District of Alaska (D. Alaska)United StatesUnited States Federal Courts
Case category
Climate Change Protesters and Scientists (US)Protesters (US)
Principal law
United StatesMaritime Law—Intentional Interference with Maritime NavigationUnited StatesMaritime Law—NuisanceUnited StatesMaritime Law—Tortious InterferenceUnited StatesMaritime Law—TrespassUnited StatesOuter Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA)United StatesState Law—ConversionUnited StatesState Law—NuisanceUnited StatesState Law—Trespass
At issue
Oil company lawsuit seeking to bar environmental activists from occupying its drilling ship bound for Arctic.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
05/29/2012
Order issued granting motion to dismiss in part and granting Shell's motion for additional preliminary injunctive relief.
Greenpeace moved to dismiss. The court granted the motion in part, dismissing the public nuisance and tortious interference claims, but declined to dismiss the other causes of action. It also expanded a previously granted restraining order blocking activists from barricading or occupying the company’s ships bound for the Arctic.
Decision
02/27/2012
Complaint filed.
Shell filed a lawsuit in Alaska federal court seeking to block environmental activists from barricading or occupying its drilling ship bound for the Arctic. The company alleged that Greenpeace members unlawfully boarded its ship in New Zealand and chained themselves to drilling equipment meant to stop the ship from reaching the Chukchi Sea. The company alleged causes for action for, among other things, nuisance, piracy, malicious mischief on the high seas, tortious interference with contractual relations, trespass, false imprisonment, and reckless endangerment.    
Complaint

Summary

Oil company lawsuit seeking to bar environmental activists from occupying its drilling ship bound for Arctic.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Risk
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance