Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Shenandoah Valley Network v. Capka

Geography
Year
2007
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2007
Status
Plaintiffs' motions to amend judgment and for leave to file second amended complaint denied.
Docket number
3:07-cv-00066
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the Western District of Virginia (W.D. Va.)
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)NEPA (US)
Principal law
United StatesNational Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
At issue
Challenge to the Federal Highway Administration’s issuance of record of decision regarding highway improvement study.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
06/17/2010
Plaintiffs' motions to amend judgment and for leave to file second amended complaint denied.
The plaintiffs subsequently moved for leave to amend the judgment and to file a second amended complaint. The court denied the motion, finding that the plaintiffs did not show grounds for amending the judgment and that permitting the requested amendments to the complaint would be futile.
Decision

Summary

Challenge to the Federal Highway Administration’s issuance of record of decision regarding highway improvement study.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Fossil fuel
Economic sector