- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- Sierra Club v. Department of Water Resources
Sierra Club v. Department of Water Resources
Geography
Year
2020
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2020
Status
Judgment denying validation of authority to issue bonds affirmed.
Geography
Docket number
C100552
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Court of Appeals (Cal. Ct. App.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Lawsuit alleging failure to comply with California Environmental Quality Act before approving revenue bonds to fund tunnel under the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
12/31/2025
Judgment denying validation of authority to issue bonds affirmed.
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s denial of validation of the Department of Water Resources’ (DWR’s) authority to issue revenue bonds for the planning, acquisition, and construction of the Delta Program, which comprises facilities for conveyance of water in, about, and through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The appellate court agreed that the Program’s contours were “too vague” to support the validation request as a modification of the project authorized by statute as the initial component of the statewide water storage and delivery system known as the State Water Project. Because it had denied validation of the bond issuance, the court did not consider cross-appeals by Sierra Club and other parties from the trial court’s denial of their claims under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Delta Reform Act, and the public trust doctrine. Under CEQA, Sierra Club and other organizations had alleged that an environmental impact report should have been prepared. They noted that DWR initiated the environmental review in January 2020 with issuance of a Notice of Preparation that listed 24 “probably significant environmental effects of the Project,” including changes in greenhouse gas emissions and increasing resiliency to respond to climate change.
Decision
Summary
Lawsuit alleging failure to comply with California Environmental Quality Act before approving revenue bonds to fund tunnel under the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance