Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Sierra Club v. EPA

Geography
Year
2011
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2011
Status
Permit vacated.
Docket number
11-73342, 11-73356
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.)United StatesUnited States Federal Courts
Case category
Federal Statutory Claims (US)Clean Air Act (US)Environmentalist Lawsuits (US)
Principal law
United StatesClean Air Act (CAA)
At issue
Challenge to EPA’s decision to issue PSD permit to gas-fired power plant in California without requiring greenhouse gas controls.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
08/12/2014
Permit vacated.
Despite agreeing that equities favored an applicant who waited more than three years for EPA to issue an air permit for a natural gas-fired power plant, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the Clean Air Act’s plain language required vacating the permit, which did not require compliance with regulatory standards in effect at the time the permit was issued. The case involved an application for a plant in Avenal, California, for which a permit application was submitted in 2008. Although the Clean Air Act requires permit determinations to be made within one year of an application, EPA did not issue its final determination until 2011, after a federal district court ordered it to do so. In the course of its deliberations on the permit application, EPA at first contended that it was required to apply new standards promulgated after the application was submitted, including the best available control technology standard for greenhouse gases, but the agency later reversed course and said that it could waive standards that became effective after the statutory one-year deadline for permit determinations. The Ninth Circuit ruled that the Clean Air Act clearly required EPA to apply the regulations in effect at the time of its permit determination and that the Clean Air Act did not allow EPA discretion to grandfather a permit application in under old air standards. The Ninth Circuit noted that this case involved an “ad hoc waiver” of applicable regulations and that its decision did not affect EPA’s ability to grandfather permits through rulemaking (for example, by setting an operative date for new regulations so that a waiver for pending applications was built into the regulation itself).
Decision
11/03/2011
Petiton for review filed.
Several environmental groups filed a lawsuit challenging EPA’s decision to grant an air permit to a planned 600 MW power plant in California. The permit exempted the facility from complying with permitting requirements for, among other things, greenhouse gas emissions because EPA received the permit application before greenhouse gas standards were proposed.
Petition

Summary

Challenge to EPA’s decision to issue PSD permit to gas-fired power plant in California without requiring greenhouse gas controls.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance