Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Sierra Club v. Port of Stockton

Geography
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2024
Status
Notice of conditional settlement and order filed.
Docket number
STK-CV-UWM-2024-0012095
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsCalifornia Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US)State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United StatesCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
At issue
Challenge to the environmental review for a hydrogen production and dispensing facility.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
07/09/2025
Notice of conditional settlement and order filed.
Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity reached a settlement agreement with the Port of Stockton and its Board of Port Commissioners (together, the Port) and the developer of a proposed hydrogen production and dispensing facility that the Port approved in August 2024. The Port agreed to rescind project approvals, to decertify the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, and to prepare an environmental impact report pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act prior to any continuation or initiation of the project or of any project proposed by the developer that would propose producing or dispensing hydrogen derived from methane on Port of Stockton property.
Settlement Agreement
09/19/2024
Verified petition for writ of mandate and complaint for injunctive relief filed.
Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit in California Superior Court challenging the Port of Stockton’s compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act in connection with approval of the BayoTech Hydrogen Production and Dispensing Facility Project, which would use methane as the feedstock to produce hydrogen. The organizations asserted that an environmental impact report should have been prepared to evaluate the project’s impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions. They alleged that the analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and other impacts in the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was inadequate and that the IS/MND failed to adequately analyze the project’s consistency with California’s climate, clean energy, and greenhouse gas reduction goals and mandates. In addition, the organizations asserted that the Port failed to adopt sufficient mitigation measures to address impacts, failed to provide an opportunity to comment on the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, failed to provide an adequate description of the project and its environmental setting, failed to analyze consistency with local land use plans, including the Stockton General Plan, Community Emissions Reduction Program, and Stockton Climate Action Plan, and failed to make adequate findings.
Petition

Summary

Challenge to the environmental review for a hydrogen production and dispensing facility.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance