Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Spoon v. Bayou Bridge Pipeline LLC

Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2019
Status
Motion for summary judgment filed by HUB Enterprises, Inc.
Docket number
3:19-cv-00516
Court/admin entity
United StatesUnited States Federal CourtsUnited States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (M.D. La.)
Case category
Climate Change Protesters and Scientists (US)Protesters (US)
Principal law
United StatesAssaultUnited StatesBatteryUnited StatesFalse ImprisonmentUnited StatesFirst AmendmentUnited StatesFourteenth AmendmentUnited StatesFourth AmendmentUnited StatesState Law—Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
At issue
Lawsuit by pipeline protesters against pipeline company, law enforcement officers, and a private security company for violation of federal and state rights.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
07/25/2022
Motion for summary judgment filed by HUB Enterprises, Inc.
Motion For Summary Judgment
03/17/2022
Memorandum filed in support of deputies' motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
08/09/2019
Complaint filed.
Three individuals who were arrested at a protest against the Bayou Bridge Pipeline in August 2018 filed a lawsuit in federal court in Louisiana asserting that the pipeline’s developer, a private security company, officers of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, a local sheriff, and other unnamed defendants violated their rights under federal and state law. The complaint alleged that environmental activists had vehemently opposed the pipeline, which they believed could exacerbate coastal erosion and “could contribute to rising sea levels, leaving coastal communities more vulnerable to hurricanes, in addition to threatening wildlife and contaminating drinking water in the surrounding areas.” The plaintiffs asserted violations of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments as well as rights established by the Louisiana Constitution. The plaintiffs also asserted intentional tort claims, including intentional infliction of emotional distress, assault, battery, and false imprisonment.
Complaint

Summary

Lawsuit by pipeline protesters against pipeline company, law enforcement officers, and a private security company for violation of federal and state rights.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance