- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Louisiana
- /
- Spoon v. Bayou Bridge Pipeline LLC
Spoon v. Bayou Bridge Pipeline LLC
Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Motion for summary judgment filed by HUB Enterprises, Inc.
Geography
Docket number
3:19-cv-00516
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (M.D. La.)
Case category
Climate Change Protesters and Scientists (US) → Protesters (US)
Principal law
United States → AssaultUnited States → BatteryUnited States → False ImprisonmentUnited States → First AmendmentUnited States → Fourteenth AmendmentUnited States → Fourth AmendmentUnited States → State Law—Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
At issue
Lawsuit by pipeline protesters against pipeline company, law enforcement officers, and a private security company for violation of federal and state rights.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
07/25/2022
Motion for summary judgment filed by HUB Enterprises, Inc.
Motion For Summary Judgment
03/17/2022
Memorandum filed in support of deputies' motion for summary judgment.
Motion For Summary Judgment
08/09/2019
Complaint filed.
Three individuals who were arrested at a protest against the Bayou Bridge Pipeline in August 2018 filed a lawsuit in federal court in Louisiana asserting that the pipeline’s developer, a private security company, officers of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections, a local sheriff, and other unnamed defendants violated their rights under federal and state law. The complaint alleged that environmental activists had vehemently opposed the pipeline, which they believed could exacerbate coastal erosion and “could contribute to rising sea levels, leaving coastal communities more vulnerable to hurricanes, in addition to threatening wildlife and contaminating drinking water in the surrounding areas.” The plaintiffs asserted violations of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments as well as rights established by the Louisiana Constitution. The plaintiffs also asserted intentional tort claims, including intentional infliction of emotional distress, assault, battery, and false imprisonment.
Complaint
Summary
Lawsuit by pipeline protesters against pipeline company, law enforcement officers, and a private security company for violation of federal and state rights.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Fossil fuel
Economic sector
Finance