Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

Stein v. Kyocera Mita America, Inc.

Geography
Year
2012
Document Type
Litigation
Part of

About this case

Filing year
2012
Status
Order and ruling issued.
Docket number
BC476821
Court/admin entity
United StatesState CourtsCalifornia Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
Climate Change Protesters and Scientists (US)Protesters (US)
Principal law
United StatesContract LawUnited StatesFirst Amendment
At issue
Action by actor Ben Stein alleging that a Japanese company unlawfully fired him for his views about climate change.
Topics
, ,

Documents

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
04/26/2012
Order and ruling issued.
A California state court partially dismissed a lawsuit brought by the actor Ben Stein, who alleged that a Japanese company breached a contract concerning a series of commercials Stein had contracted to do because of his belief that human activity plays no role in climate change. The court dismissed the breach of contract and related claims, holding that there was insufficient evidence that Stein had conclusively entered into an agreement with the company. The court also said that the defendant had acted in furtherance of its exercise of its constitutional right to free speech on the public issue of global warming. However, the court allowed his claim for publicity rights misappropriation to go forward. The actor claims that after withdrawing his offer, the company hired an actor that looks like him to appear in the commercial in question.
Decision

Summary

Action by actor Ben Stein alleging that a Japanese company unlawfully fired him for his views about climate change.

 Topics mentioned most in this case  
Beta

See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance