- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Louisiana
- /
- Stewart v. Entergy Corp.
Stewart v. Entergy Corp.
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Remand order affirmed.
Geography
Docket number
22-30177
Court/admin entity
United States → United States Federal Courts → United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (5th Cir.)
Case category
Adaptation (US) → Actions seeking money damages for losses (US)
Principal law
United States → Contract LawUnited States → State Law–Strict LiabilityUnited States → State Law—Negligence
At issue
Lawsuit seeking to hold an electricity provider liable for damages allegedly sustained as a result of the failure of electrical infrastructure during Hurricane Ida.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
05/27/2022
Remand order affirmed.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed an order remanding to Louisiana state court a class action lawsuit brought by individuals who alleged that Entergy Corporation and related entities (Entergy) negligently designed, operated, and maintained the electricity transmission system, which led to power outages in the wake of Hurricane Ida. The plaintiffs’ allegations included that Entergy was aware of climate change and aware that Louisiana was experiencing more hurricanes and other severe weather. The plaintiffs also alleged that Entergy failed to take actions in response to deficiencies identified in a 2007 “Hardening Study.” In its opinion affirming the remand order, the Fifth Circuit held that the Class Action Fairness Act’s (CAFA’s) local controversy and home state exceptions barred federal jurisdiction. The court also held that it lacked jurisdiction to review other asserted grounds for federal jurisdiction. (The Fifth Circuit concluded that the Supreme Court’s decision in <a href="https://climatecasechart.com/wp-content/uploads/case-documents/2021/20210517_docket-19-1189_opinion.pdf">BP p.l.c. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore</a> extending appellate review to the entire remand order when one ground for removal is the federal officer removal statute or the civil rights removal statute did not expressly or implicitly overrule Fifth Circuit precedent barring appellate review of non-CAFA-related grounds for removal.)
Decision
Summary
Lawsuit seeking to hold an electricity provider liable for damages allegedly sustained as a result of the failure of electrical infrastructure during Hurricane Ida.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Finance