- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Massachusetts
- /
- Sunpin Energy Services, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Petersham
Sunpin Energy Services, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Petersham
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Judgment upholding denial of special permit reversed and case remanded for entry of an order remanding the case to the Zoning Board for issuance of the permit.
Geography
Docket number
24-P-18
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → Massachusetts Appeals Court (Mass. App. Ct.)
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Other Types of State Law Cases (US)
Principal law
United States → Massachusetts Dover Amendment
At issue
Challenge to the denial of a special permit for a large-scale solar energy system on rural private property where tree cutting would be required.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
07/09/2025
Judgment upholding denial of special permit reversed and case remanded for entry of an order remanding the case to the Zoning Board for issuance of the permit.
The Massachusetts Appeals Court reversed the Land Court’s judgment upholding the denial by the Zoning Board of Appeals of Petersham of a special permit for a large-scale solar energy system on rural private property. Approval of the permit required a unanimous vote by the three-member board. Although two members voted to approve the special permit application, the third member voted against it, citing, among other factors, its incompatibility with the State’s energy policy, as embodied in the State’s Clean Energy Results Questions & Answers Ground Mounted Solar Photovoltaic Systems and the Massachusetts 2050 Decarbonization Roadmap, which the board member concluded discouraged siting of solar projects in forests where significant tree cutting is required. The Appeals Court found that the denial was “contrary to the legislative goal of promoting solar energy and rested primarily on the subjective beliefs of one board member” and found that the board exceeded its discretionary powers when it concluded that maintaining forest land was preferable to solar energy development.
Decision
08/30/2024
Reply brief filed by appellants.
Reply
07/26/2024
Brief filed by defendants-appellees.
Brief
05/06/2024
Brief filed by appellants.
Brief
Summary
Challenge to the denial of a special permit for a large-scale solar energy system on rural private property where tree cutting would be required.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance