- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- Massachusetts
- /
- Sunpin Energy Services, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Petersham
Sunpin Energy Services, LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Petersham
Geography
Year
2021
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2021
Status
Judgment of Land Court in favor of Town vacated.
Geography
Docket number
SJC-13860
Court/admin entity
United States → Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (Mass.)United States → State Courts
Case category
State Law Claims (US) → Other Types of State Law Cases (US)
Principal law
United States → Massachusetts Dover AmendmentUnited States → State Law—Land Use Laws → Massachusetts Zoning Law
At issue
Challenge to the denial of a special permit for a large-scale solar energy system on rural private property where tree cutting would be required.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
07/14/2026
Judgment of Land Court in favor of Town vacated.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the Town of Petersham Zoning Board of Appeals (Zoning Board) did not provide “reasonable opportunities” to build solar energy systems, as required by Massachusetts law, when it denied a special permit for a large-scale ground-mounted solar energy system. The court concluded that a special permit for such a project could not be denied unless denial was “necessary to protect public health, safety, or welfare,” a determination that requires “individualized and site-specific reasons.” The court described the Zoning Board’s denial as based on “generally applicable concerns about tree cutting,” which in a town that is 97% forested would effectively constitute a “blanket prohibition” on large-scale ground-mounted solar energy systems. The court found that because Massachusetts law (the solar provision of the Dover Amendment) requires that “sylvan as well as urban communities” provide reasonable opportunities for solar energy facility development, the denial of the special permit was improper. The Supreme Judicial Court directed that the matter be remanded to the Zoning Board for further proceedings.
Decision
04/03/2026
Brief filed by amici curiae Real Estate Bar Association for Massachusetts, Inc. and the Abstract Club.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/31/2026
Amicus letter in support of neither party filed by Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/19/2026
Brief filed by amici curiae Community Land and Water Coalition, Inc. et al. in support of defendant-appellee in support of affirmance of land court decision and reversal of appeals court decision.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/18/2026
Brief filed by amici curiae Solar Energy Industries Association and Alliance for Climate Transition in support of appellants.
Amicus Motion/Brief
03/17/2026
Reply brief filed by appellants.
Reply
02/17/2026
Brief filed by appellees.
Brief
01/21/2026
Brief filed by appellants.
Brief
Summary
Challenge to the denial of a special permit for a large-scale solar energy system on rural private property where tree cutting would be required.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance