Skip to content
The Climate Litigation Database

The Philippine Movement for Climate Justice et al. vs. Standard Chartered

Geography
International
Year
2024
Document Type
Litigation

About this case

Filing year
2024
Status
Pending
Geography
International
Court/admin entity
OECD → United Kingdom National Contact Point
Case category
–
Principal law
International Law → OECD Guidelines
Topics
, ,  

Documents

Each case in our database can contain one or more documents.

Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
02/26/2024
On February 26, 2024, the Philippine Movement for Climate Justice, Inclusive Development International, Recourse, and BankTrack filed a complaint on behalf of local Filipino communities against Standard Chartered plc to the UK NCP. The complainants argued that in financing four coal-fired power plants in the Philippines, Standard Chartered breached Chapters II (General Policies) and IV (Human Rights) of the 2011 version of the OECD Guidelines. The complaint alleges failure to conduct effective due diligence on human rights harms and failure to cooperate in the remediation of harms that arose as a result of that failed due diligence. In 2017, the affected communities filed a complaint to the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO), the independent accountability mechanism of the International Finance Corporation (IFC), that led to a finding that IFC violated its Policy on Environmental and Social Sustainability through these and other coal plants in the Philippines. The CAO concluded that the coal plants likely caused a range of “significant” environmental and social harms and the IFC is now implementing a “management action plan.” As one of the lenders, Standard Chartered has not cooperated in the remediation process; thus, one objective of the NCP complaint is to encourage effective cooperation.
Complaint

Summary

On February 26, 2024, the Philippine Movement for Climate Justice, Inclusive Development International, Recourse, and BankTrack filed a complaint on behalf of local Filipino communities against Standard Chartered plc to the UK NCP. The complainants argued that in financing four coal-fired power plants in the Philippines, Standard Chartered breached Chapters II (General Policies) and IV (Human Rights) of the 2011 version of the OECD Guidelines. The complaint alleges failure to conduct effective due diligence on human rights harms and failure to cooperate in the remediation of harms that arose as a result of that failed due diligence.

In 2017, the affected communities filed a complaint to the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO), the independent accountability mechanism of the International Finance Corporation (IFC), that led to a finding that IFC violated its Policy on Environmental and Social Sustainability through these and other coal plants in the Philippines. The CAO concluded that the coal plants likely caused a range of “significant” environmental and social harms and the IFC is now implementing a “management action plan.” As one of the lenders, Standard Chartered has not cooperated in the remediation process; thus, one objective of the NCP complaint is to encourage effective cooperation.

 Topics mentioned most in this case

See how often Topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document.

Group
Topics
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance