- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- United States
- /
- California
- /
- The Two Hundred v. Governor’s Office of Planning & Research
The Two Hundred v. Governor’s Office of Planning & Research
Geography
Year
2019
Document Type
Litigation
Part of
About this case
Filing year
2019
Status
Motion for preliminary injunction filed by petitioners.
Geography
Docket number
CIV-DS-1938432
Court/admin entity
United States → State Courts → California Superior Court (Cal. Super. Ct.)
Case category
Constitutional Claims (US) → Fourteenth Amendment (US)State Law Claims (US) → State Impact Assessment Laws (US)
Principal law
United States → California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)United States → California Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32)United States → Fair Housing ActUnited States → Fourteenth Amendment—Due ProcessUnited States → Fourteenth Amendment—Equal Protection
At issue
Challenge to new California Environmental Quality Act regulations.
Topics
, ,
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics
Beta
06/02/2020
Motion for preliminary injunction filed by petitioners.
The nonprofit organization The Two Hundred and residents of San Bernardino County in California filed a motion for a preliminary injunction in their lawsuit challenging new California Environmental Quality Act regulations, which the petitioners assert violate the federal and state constitutions, federal and state fair housing laws, the Global Warming Solutions Act, CEQA itself, and other laws. In their motion, the petitioners asked the court to enjoin the part of one of the new regulations that the petitioners describe as making “the act of driving a car or pickup truck (even an electric vehicle), for even a single mile in even a carpool on an existing road, a newly-invented ‘vehicle mile travelled’ (‘VMT’) ‘impact’ to the environment.” They contended that enforcement of the new VMT regulation outside transit priority areas would “worsen housing availability and affordability, thereby causing disparate harms to minority Californian[s],” and that the pandemic had exacerbated the harms. They argued that the legislature had considered and “uniformly rejected” laws requiring VMT reduction to achieve reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and that the adoption of the VMT regulation was procedurally deficient.
Motion
12/19/2019
Petition for writ of mandate filed.
Petition
Summary
Challenge to new California Environmental Quality Act regulations.
Topics mentioned most in this case Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Target
Policy instrument
Risk
Impacted group
Just transition
Renewable energy
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Adaptation/resilience
Finance