- Climate Litigation Database
- /
- Search
- /
- Guyana
- /
- Thomas v. EPA
Thomas v. EPA
About this case
Filing year
2020
Status
Decided
Geography
Court/admin entity
Guyana → Supreme Court
Case category
Suits against governments (Global) → Environmental assessment and permitting (Global) → Natural resource extraction (Global)
Principal law
Guyana → Environmental Protection Act 1996
At issue
Whether environmental permit that allowed oil exploration and production for 23 years violated Guyanese environmental regulations limiting such permits to five years
Topics
, ,  
Documents
Filing Date
Document
Type
Topics 
Beta
Summary
Guyanese scientist Dr. Troy Thomas filed a case against the EPA of Guyana in the Supreme Court, alleging that the 23-year permits EPA had issued to Esso Exploration (a subsidiary of Exxon) for oil exploration violated regulations under the Environmental Protection Act that limited such permit lengths to five years. EPA had issued permits to Esso that ran through 2040 and 2043. In an affidavit supporting the filing, Thomas argued that issuing such a long permit in violation of law "exposes Guyana and the rest of the world to serious, if not irreparable, harm and adverse consequences from climate change."
On October 7, 2020, the Supreme Court of Guyana issued a consent order accepting a settlement between Thomas, EPA, and Esso. EPA agreed to reduce the term to of the permits to five years, so that they would expire in 2022 and 2024. The Court also ordered EPA to pay Thomas' court costs.
 Topics mentioned most in this case  Beta
See how often topics get mentioned in this case and view specific passages of text highlighted in each document. Accuracy is not 100%. Learn more
Group
Topics
Risk
Fossil fuel
Greenhouse gas
Economic sector
Finance